<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Vaughn On Movies - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-14f63028" type="application/json"/><link>http://vaughnonmovies.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="http://vaughnonmovies.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 23:25:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Avengers **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/the-avengers/#comment-529908732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I went into this movie thinking it would be overblown hype and just be average...I came out of the theater DEFINITELY satisfied with the movie. Best action movie I've see in a LONG time! Vaughn is right on about the lack of villain part though. I do disagree on the 2.5 * rating. There were some downright hilarious parts in this movie and also some awesome dramatic parts. The scene which Loki has everyone kneeling and one man stands up and says something moved me as well...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Stone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 23:25:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Avengers **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/the-avengers/#comment-529832137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;2.5 out or 4 is more critical than negative. The Avengers is what I expected it to be, nothing more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vaughn On Movies</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:36:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Films of the Noughties (2000-2009)</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2009/12/top-10-films-of-the-noughties-2000-2009/#comment-528620700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great choice with Memento - but lots of the others are too boring and just your typical action movies for my liking.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://sodasparkle.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://sodasparkle.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ruth Bajar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:14:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: District 9 **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2009/08/district-9/#comment-528613151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well we do have our own perception of things. I actually loved this movie and I normally hate anything sc-fi related!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://nutritionistbrisbane.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://nutritionistbrisbane.co...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ruth Bajar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:04:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Avengers **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/the-avengers/#comment-528541748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You really have something different in mind. This movie has earned positive reviews and feedback from viewers but you, you had the opposite one. But did you manage to watch it for entertainment purposes?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mikerowleyconstructions.com.au/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.mikerowleyconstruct...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ruth Bajar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:37:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Shadows **</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/dark-shadows/#comment-528299624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;vampires eating waffles?? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 02:33:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Shadows **</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/dark-shadows/#comment-527634826</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think we're nearing the end of this era of vampire cinema. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don't know who told Tim Burton to try and be like other directors, but it was the worst advice possible.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vaughn On Movies</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 01:01:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dark Shadows **</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/dark-shadows/#comment-527466135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So Tim Burton being Tim Burton? When is Hollywood going to give up on Vampires already? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Money Elzer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 17:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Legion *</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2010/01/legion/#comment-526282747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.buy-levofloxacin.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;buy levaquin &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well your strategy certainly seems to be working for you my friend. I should really think about mimicking or “at least” trying a few of the things you do more often.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">levofloxacin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 09:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Avengers **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/the-avengers/#comment-523444166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not looking like a video review will be possible. I'm considering a supplimentary post divulging thoughts on spoiler related content.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vaughn On Movies</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Avengers **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/the-avengers/#comment-522459937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i hope the movie does not have a love story &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 01:44:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiny Furniture **</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/tiny-furniture/#comment-521686064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Story line sounds good. It seems a kinda kids movie as well as something innovative and inspiring, which we used to do during childhood, something new everyday and thinking of life as a game and want to be inside a video game or something. Fun ultimately, isn't it? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Employee Time Clock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:28:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Avengers **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/the-avengers/#comment-521350209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotta respectfully disagree with you, I saw it and loved it. It was the greatest pure comic book movie ever made, it had a few flaws but 200.3 Million opening weekend and 93% on Rotten Tomatoes, people tend to agree with me. Please do video review when possible.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Money-Elzer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 23:33:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Avengers **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/the-avengers/#comment-520183417</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh my God you really are a nit picky idiot who offers nothing but criticism of the smallest details. Here's a radicial thought Nick Fury is the director of a massive spy/military agency, he might have more then two agents under his command. It is clear you have no clue or love of cinema or movies or the source material and that you are the worst person to talk about movies on the internet. Calling you a critic would give you too much credit!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 10:20:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiny Furniture **</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/tiny-furniture/#comment-519429305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It does sound like a kiddie film. By my standards it was made by a kid.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vaughn On Movies</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 17:57:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiny Furniture **</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/05/tiny-furniture/#comment-517380388</link><description>&lt;p&gt; tiny furniture would make a great kids movie &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 02:00:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Five-Year Engagement ***½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/04/the-five-year-engagement/#comment-517373213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;well at least it doesn't look like a love story  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 01:47:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Five-Year Engagement ***½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/04/the-five-year-engagement/#comment-514168805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jason Segel co-wrote the screenplay. I can't speak of his level of involvement, but that's how he's credited. I haven't seen all of Forgetting Sarah Marshall, but what I saw was ok.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not getting very good vibes from The Avengers. It just seems that too many of the characters are biting off more than they can chew. I've never cared for Scarlett Johansson and can't imagine a favorable scenario for her character. Seeing her posing with a 9mm when the Incredible Hulk is near is laughable. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vaughn On Movies</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:00:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Five-Year Engagement ***½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/04/the-five-year-engagement/#comment-513675194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't believe I couldn't get a screening to this, 2 questions Is it written by Jason Segal and how does it compare to Forgetting Sarah Marshall? Next week when you see The Avengers your 'best movie of 2012' will be bumped &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Money Elzer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:11:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Hunger Games **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/03/the-hunger-games/#comment-508731754</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It wasn't bad but I agree... fair rating. It was more build &amp;amp; come on nudge nudge story than a heroine like say a Selene from Underworld.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonfun</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:46:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Being Elmo: A Puppeteer&amp;#8217;s Journey ***½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/04/being-elmo-a-puppeteers-journey/#comment-507771231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey its very entertaining being a pupeter.&lt;br&gt;nice article.Thanks for sharing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ecommerce development</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:03:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Pirates! Band of Misfits ***</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/04/the-pirates-band-of-misfits/#comment-505702888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's smooth, but the technique is something of a rarity but I wouldn't call it a dying art.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vaughn On Movies</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:44:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Pirates! Band of Misfits ***</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/04/the-pirates-band-of-misfits/#comment-504925293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the animation looks good but sort of outdated  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:15:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lockout **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/04/lockout/#comment-498464856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I honestly thought Lockout looked like a winner in early marketing. It turns out it's too much of a ripoff and there aren't enough "wow" moments of action to satisfy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Still, I can't get behind the idea of excavating graves for entertainment revenue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vaughn On Movies</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lockout **½</title><link>http://www.vaughnonmovies.com/2012/04/lockout/#comment-498057289</link><description>&lt;p&gt; the three stooges looks better then lockout&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 03:22:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
